Re: gcc 4.8 warnings and xentools42

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:42:35AM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
>    temp = E1000_READ_REG(hw, CRCERRS);
>    temp = E1000_READ_REG(hw, SYMERRS);
> ...
> 
> So, temp is never used, but it looks as though this is an attempt to
> make sure the READ isn't optimised away? Safe to just get rid of the 
> temp?

If the E1000_READ_REG properly uses bus space or a volatile pointer, the
storing to temp is not needed.

Martin