Re: Binary packages still missing from i386/5.1_2013Q2 ?

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:15:06PM -0400, Anne Bennett wrote:
> 
> Is compilation still in progress for the 2013Q2 binary packages
> for the i386 architecture?  I'm running 5.2_STABLE, and I usually
> use the binaries for 5.1.  Just now I compared what I have (pkg_info)
> with the list on the ftp site, and still missing are:
> 
>   SDL
>   abiword
>   agg
>   cairo
>   cairo-gobject
>   cairomm
>   firefox
>   gegl
>   gimp
>   gnash
>   gnumeric
>   gnuplot
>   goffice0.8
>   graphviz
>   gtk2+
>   gtkmm
>   gtkspell
>   gutenprint-lib
>   inkscape
>   librsvg
>   ms-ttf
>   pango
>   pangomm
>   pangox-compat
>   poppler-glib
>   py27-cairo
>   py27-gobject
>   sane-frontends
>   xsane
>   xulrunner
> 
> That seems an unusually large list, including some pretty important
> (to me!) stuff (firefox, gimp, gnuplot, and xsane in particular).
> You guys are usually great about making the binary packages available,
> so I'm wondering if something's the matter...

I've not checked the whole list, but I guess they're all failed
because MesaLib failed.
It fails because:
Requested 'glproto >= 1.4.11' but version of GLProto is 1.4.10

I don't know why GLProto is 1.4.10 is not enough.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--