Re: libcroco and xz

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:51:56PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:40:50 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:24:02PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> >>I see...
> >>
> >>using *.xz archive, so marked as build depend on archive/xz,
> >>but check-shlib claims using shlibs from build depends.
> >>It's false alarm.
> >
> >I can reproduce it now. It is *not* a false alarm. libxml2 should be
> >pulling in a full xz dependency, since libxml2.so depends on it now, but
> >it only gets counted as build dependency.
> 
> No, not only directly build dependency, but also indirectly full dependency.
> In other words, directly build dependency on `xzcat' command from archive/xz,
> and indirect full dependency on `liblzma' from archive/xz.

Right, there is no such thing as an indirect full dependency...

Joerg