Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)

To: Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:35:50 +0200

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:06:06AM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote:
> That's where we get into a bikeshed about what to call it (not
> obvious given ffmpeg's crazy version numbering).

What was the version number at that time in pkgsrc?
 Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: Stephen Borrill

References:
- long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: Stephen Borrill

Prev by Date: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Next by Date: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Previous by Thread: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Next by Thread: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index