Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update

To: joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost
Subject: Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
From: Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:33:04 +0900 (JST)

In message <20111107142652.GA3914%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
        on Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:26:52 +0100,
        Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:04:51PM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
>> * RUBY_VERSION_DEFAULT would be changed:
>> 
>>      from:   1.8 or 1.9
>>      to:     18, 192 or 193.
> 
> Is it really necessary?
Which part do you mean?

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>/<taca%back-street.net@localhost>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
  - From: Takahiro Kambe
- Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
Next by Date: Re: aix.mk check for /usr/vac/README
Previous by Thread: Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
Next by Thread: Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index