Re: Subversion without python and/or Ruby?

[Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>]

Hi!

Shouldnt be all meta packages in /meta-pkgs?
Its just causing too much confusion that way. :)

Eric Gillespie wrote:

> Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> writes:
> 
> >      Even worse -- the subversion meta package insists on "building" Sun's
> >   JDK. Anyone have any luck installing that on a NetBSD/amd64 system?
> > 
> >      Subversion, Python, Ruby, et. al. Are extremly portable -- Java is
> >   not. I see no reason to disable the subversion meta package for all the
> >   non-i386 users out there.
> > 
> >      Subversion already uses the options framework -- wouldn't it make
> >   sense to add Java as an option which isn't enabled by default?
> 
> devel/subversion is not some random subset of Subversion chosen
> by the packager; it depends on all Subversion (well, all that
> we've gotten around to packaging yet ;-> ; I think it's complete,
> now that I've packaged javahl).  If you want specific components,
> install them separately.  Maybe all you want is subversion-base.
> 
> -- 
> Eric Gillespie <*> epg%NetBSD.org@localhost


--
Adam