Re: converters/wv2 insists on libiconv

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:04:50PM +0300, Arto Huusko wrote:
> I'm on NetBSD (-current), which has an iconv of its own, so
> gnu libiconv should not be needed? Or does wv2 really need
> the GNU libiconv?

It might depend on GNU specific behaviour in a number of places, e.g.
silent handling of unconvertible characters etc. The package explicitly
requests GNU iconv.

Joerg