On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:57:20AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Quentin Garnier <cube%cubidou.net@localhost> writes: > > > You can't bridge a wpi. I don't think you can bridge with any of > > NetBSD's wireless drivers: not only you need a card that supports > > having as many associations to the AP as required, but of course you > > need the software support. > > I had never thought of that, but I see your point. Thoughts arising: > > 1) If it doesn't work brconfig should fail. Well, it works if the interface is in AP mode... Maybe add an ethercap flag? > 2) I wonder if another encapsulation would enable this to work. My > 802.11 spec memory is very fuzzy at this point, but I recall a way to > carry 802.3 frames in 802.11, rather than the encapsulation that puts > only the data and puts the 802.3 addresses in the 802.11 header. But would you expect the AP to support that? -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks Owe it to yourself not to fail" Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.
Attachment:
pgpl7v0nLwT4e.pgp
Description: PGP signature