Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?

["Johnny C. Lam" <jlam%pkgsrc.org@localhost>]

Greg Troxel wrote:
> Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > > "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:
> > > >         cd /usr/pkg
> > > >         ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
> > > >
> > > > Could someone check this?  My setup is a bit odd.
> > > I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me.  But, I'm not at
> > > all sure what's correct.  Is there a grand plan for where Linux
> > > programs live on NetBSD/i386?  Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
> > > are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
> > > /usr/pkg but not emul.  Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
> > > emul/linux?
> > Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework?  I 
> > haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always 
> > installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.
>
> I think this behavior started with the new framework, but I'm not sure
> that it's intentional.

Yes, this was unintentional.  I've fixed this on HEAD with a PKGREVISION 
bump for openoffice2-bin.

        Cheers,

        -- Johnny Lam <jlam%pkgsrc.org@localhost>