Re: chat/pidgin

[Jan Danielsson <jan.m.danielsson%gmail.com@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Klaus Heinz wrote:
>> For me, it would be useful. Though Pidgin and Finch can be considered
>> separate.
> 
> This indicates, IMO, that there should be two packges chat/pidgin
> and chat/finch. Both would use the same source archive and probably
> share a Makefile.common.

   I'm making three packages, like in FreeBSD ports: chat/libpurple,
chat/pidgin and chat/finch.

   I'm not entirely sure how to work around some issues with the options
framwork and multiple packages, but I'll figure it out.


- --
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGW4NtuPlHKFfKXTYRCpwFAJ4mnvhG89pGedLNlp9cj/YEpt4OtgCfVclm
ufn+MG25/ZAIUmkDMOTkJfg=
=d2Lw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----