Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Robert Elz wrote:
>=20
>>   | > When I want to build a binary package that has a lot of
>>   dependencies, is | > there anything special I need to do in order
>>   to also make packages of | > those missing dependencies that are
>>   built in the process?  Is it   | > possible? |
>>   | "make package" should do that automatically.
>>=20
>> Really?
>>=20
>> You mean if I have no binary packages at all, but lots of packages
>> installed, and I go to some new package and do
>>=20
>> 	make package
>>=20
>> you're guaranteeing that when that finishes my binary package
>> directory will have binary packages for everything needed?
>=20
> No. That is diferent. The original question was "... also make
> packages of those missing dependencies that are built in the process?"

>=20
> If you want packages of stuff you already have installed, then you can
> also use pkg_tarup.=20

Yes, I knew about pkg_tarup, but was hoping to avoid having to make a
list of what other new things were built so I could go back and use it.
If make package does what I need, that's exactly what I was looking for.

Thanks,
Tim


--=20
Tim Larson
West Corporation, Interactive TeleServices
Eschew obfuscation!