OBATA,

For now, it is OK.   Bouml will run and update fine for both cases: one 
- hicolor directory is shared, or two - hicolor directory is placed 
under bouml control only.

"Someone" else wanted the icons in the shared directory.  If the 
"someone" needs the icons in the shared directory to help with another 
program, and bouml runs fine, then I say OK.  If the other program needs 
the cache updated, then "someone" can let me know at that time.  My 
guess is the "someone" will have the ability to update the cache 
manually, but that "someone" can not move the icons from directory to 
directory.  It is not perfect, but it is better than having the icons 
unavailable from the shared directory.

I will add a MESSAGE about the icons.

OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:33:54 -0500, Kenneth Freidank wrote:
>   
>> I added the USE_DIRS line, but I also manually edited the PLIST file.  
>> "make-PLIST" missed a lot of files.  The package installs and deinstalls 
>> without errors.
>>
>> Is it ready now?
>>     
>
> What will be happend with packages using graphics/hicolor-icon-theme?
> If you try to delete hicolor-icon-theme, then it try to remove icon directory.
> If add/delete packages using graphics/hicolor-icon-theme, it try to update
> icon cache information. But add/delete bouml, such a updating is't occured.
> Is it OK? No problem?
>
> --
> "Of course I love NetBSD":-)
> OBATA Akio / obata@lins.jp
>
>
>