On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:59:30PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:49:32PM -0700, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > So... why do the binary builds have to use the default options?
> > Why can't (or shouldn't) they have everything on by default?
> 
> ..
> 
> Do you agree that this is a very stupid question? They are the *default*
> options for a reason...
> 

The question is rather, why does "default" imply "kde" ???

Regards,

-Martin