Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > Ok, now that got me confused. :) (And just when I thought I am done > > with my questions hehe!). I really did think that the 2006-Q1 branch > > is older than -current. My impression was that its a stable freeze of > > -current, made sometime in March 2006, and after that all it has is > > just security updates. So that way -current has nearly 2 months worth > > of newer software than 2006-Q1. Turns out I was wrong? (By "stable > > freeze" above, I meant that all the software in that are stable and > > work well with each other etc). > > I remember someone pointing out that 2006Q1 is a different branch (I > > think he used the word "revision") ... but I didn't pay much attention > > coz I thought he meant it was a different "older" branch ... How did you receive the mail you've replied to? The part above was non-existent in the mail I received. There was only quoted text. That was at least the second time this happened on this list. -- Christian
Attachment:
pgpuerI_7mPiP.pgp
Description: PGP signature