Subject: Re: pkgsrc-stable branch stories?
To: None <pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
List: pkgsrc-users
Date: 04/17/2006 11:35:33
--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Johnny Lam <jlam@pkgsrc.org> wrote:
=20
> I personally use the stable branch on production servers. I find it=20
> avoids the chaos of keeping up with rapidly changing PKGREVISIONs that=20
> happen on pkgsrc HEAD at times. I keep a sandbox handy for rebuilding=20
> packages when there is a security update on the stable branch, and I=20
> update all of my software to the newest stable branch every quarter.
Pretty much the same here, with the exception that I do not update all
my software regularly. I generally update the pkgsrc branch when a new
one is released, but only rebuild packages when there is a reason
(security issue, user request).
-Jan
--=20
Except most of the good bits were about frogs, I remember that.
You would not believe some of the things about frogs.
--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFEQ7XFfFtkr68iakwRArobAKCtBrPWJEsHIoDBDuvbpXX4hIsWUACgl6zo
EFTyktGAbrLgaTaKpgQYVjg=
=JZda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ--