Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/rust

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost>]

* On 2025-10-18 at 18:14 BST, Havard Eidnes wrote:

> --- pkgsrc/lang/rust/patches/patch-vendor_libc-0.2.172_src_unix_solarish_mod.rs:1.2     Tue Aug 26 13:56:24 2025
> +++ pkgsrc/lang/rust/patches/patch-vendor_libc-0.2.172_src_unix_solarish_mod.rs Sat Oct 18 17:14:35 2025
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -$NetBSD: patch-vendor_libc-0.2.172_src_unix_solarish_mod.rs,v 1.2 2025/08/26 13:56:24 jperkin Exp $
> +$NetBSD: patch-vendor_libc-0.2.172_src_unix_solarish_mod.rs,v 1.3 2025/10/18 17:14:35 he Exp $
>
> Fix xattr build.
>
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Fix xattr build.
>  pub const ENOTRECOVERABLE: c_int = 59;
>  pub const ENOSTR: c_int = 60;
> +// This is not supported but is required for xattr
> -+pub const ENOATTR: c_int = ENODATA;
> ++pub const ENOATTR: ::c_int = ::ENODATA;
>  pub const ENODATA: c_int = 61;
>  pub const ETIME: c_int = 62;
>  pub const ENOSR: c_int = 63;

Hey Havard,

Thanks for maintaining rust, I know it's not an easy task, however this 
is the third time these patches have been broken.  When you create a new 
package in wip for testing, please could you ensure that the main pkgsrc 
package is used as the repository of record so that we don't lose 
changes like this?

I try to test the wip packages when I can, but it's a manual process, 
while the main pkgsrc package gets automatically tested every single day 
and should always be the most "correct".

Thanks,

--
Jonathan Perkin                    pkgsrc.smartos.org
Open Source Complete Cloud   www.tritondatacenter.com