pkgsrc-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/ruby
In message <20170621145514.GM22442%joyent.com@localhost>
on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:55:14 +0100,
Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost> wrote:
> * On 2017-06-21 at 14:11 BST, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
>
>> Module Name: pkgsrc
>> Committed By: taca
>> Date: Wed Jun 21 13:11:19 UTC 2017
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> pkgsrc/lang/ruby: rails.mk
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Overhaul framework of Ruby on Rails to support coexistence of rails32
>> and rails42.
>>
>> * Rename RUBY_RAILS_VERSION to RAILS_VERSION.
>> * Remove detection of installed Ruby on Rails.
>> * Add ${RUBY_RAILS} to PKGBASE of each Ruby on Rails' pacakge.
>
> Should we add rails to mk/pbulk/pbulk-index.mk so that each
> combination is built?
Above change would not create multiple package from one pkgsrc
direcotry, such as building ruby23-readline and ruby24-readline
from devel/ruby-readline.
It change PKGBASE only.
Previously:
devel/ruby-activesupport32 => ruby23-activesupport-3.2.x.tar.gz
devel/ruby-activesupport42 => ruby23-activesupport-4.2.x.tar.gz
Now:
devel/ruby-activesupport32 => ruby23-activesupport32-3.2.x.tar.gz
devel/ruby-activesupport42 => ruby23-activesupport42-4.2.x.tar.gz
So, binary packages could be installed as the same time,
ruby23-activesupport32 and ruby23-activesupport42.
A few packages could build with depending ruby-activesupport32 or
ruby-activesupport42, but their binary packages dose not change their
names as before.
So, it might be added to pbulk-index but no strong requirement for me.
Best regards.
--
Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index