Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/games/liquidwar

[John Marino <marino%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On 12/12/2011 5:26 PM, David A. Holland wrote:
> Module Name:    pkgsrc
> Committed By:   dholland
> Date:           Mon Dec 12 16:26:38 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
>         pkgsrc/games/liquidwar: Makefile distinfo
>         pkgsrc/games/liquidwar/patches: patch-aa patch-ab
>
> Log Message:
> This isn't a 32-bit program, it's an ordinary program that for some curious
> reason believes that "x86_64" is a 32-bit Intel platform. Fix that, and
> reenable Dragonfly.
>
> While here, add patch comments and include desktopdb.mk. Bump PKGREVISION
> for the latter.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 pkgsrc/games/liquidwar/Makefile
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 pkgsrc/games/liquidwar/distinfo
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 pkgsrc/games/liquidwar/patches/patch-aa
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 pkgsrc/games/liquidwar/patches/patch-ab
>
> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> copyright notices on the relevant files.
okay, that builds on dfly64, but what about the --32 flag to the assembler?
Is that ok? Between the i386 target and that assembler flag (and the i386
assembly code), that was enough to convince me the author really wanted
the i386 platform.

John