On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:39:01 +0900, Alistair Crooks <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost> wrote:
Sorry for not involving you earlier in this one - I did not check who the interix-pkg-people were and had kind of assumed that it was tv@, and so added the section myself (when it was sent to me). It did seem to me to make sense, though, and certainly shouldn't cause any harm, and if it does mean that non-standard values of LD_LIBRARY_PATH are now catered for, as well as the default ones, then it should be a win. Why do you think this is not only unnecessary, but also undesired?
I believe it's a policy of pkgsrc (link with rpath, no need runtime settings), and LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be abused, it's a last resort. -- OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost