Alistair Crooks wrote:
> You're going to have to help me out with this one - I maintain
> standalone-tcsh (I presume this is what the commit message refers to),
> and the package itself builds, installs and de-installs just fine,
> thanks.  I don't remember agreeing anything about any CHECK_FILES
> test.

Did you also try with PKG_DEVELOPER=yes?

> If the build/install infrastructure needs workarounds to accommodate
> standalone-tcsh, then fine, put the workarounds in, but please don't
> blame standalone-tcsh for the short-comings of another part of the
> system.

It's not a shortcoming, but a convention that all programs are installed 
into ${LOCALBASE}. There are only two packages that don't do so. 
shells/standalone-tcsh and pkgtools/rc.subr. As noted in PR 33899 by 
Joerg, it would be nice if all packages would honour LOCALBASE.

Roland