--Signature=_Thu__13_Jan_2005_11_15_02_+0100_3bSVm0.CeyCz0x/K
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:13:27 +0100
"Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv@menta.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 01:31 +0000, Juan Romero Pardines wrote:
> > Bumped PKGREVISION to all icewm* pkgs for the bulk builds.
> 
> Why?  The package wasn't building before (i.e., no binary package
> available), so the revision bumps were not needed.

Good point... you are right, bumping PKGREVISION is not needed,
I've backed out this.

--Signature=_Thu__13_Jan_2005_11_15_02_+0100_3bSVm0.CeyCz0x/K
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFB5kopypkLYVDran0RAlQ7AJ46/gFtCTGlx1t8apt70RKEGLjt2wCgrlzs
eOjeJ2L0mJ9qkovnqZMUxuo=
=RPWX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__13_Jan_2005_11_15_02_+0100_3bSVm0.CeyCz0x/K--