On Saturday 16 October 2004 06:19, Stoned Elipot wrote:
> XXX Shouldn't ../x11/Xrandr/buildlink3.mk included instead if X Extension
> in X11BASE is supported so a dependency on Xrandr package is eventually
> included?

This test was added to deal with systems using a sufficiently old in-tree X 
that didn't have the appropriate Xrandr support so that the support wasn't 
built in.  Since then the X situation has got more complex with the various 
pkgsrc based X builds (X11R6, xorg) as well as the in-tree ones and I'm 
fairly sure the current test wont deal correctly with all those cases.

As I think your suggesting, I should probably just replace it with a 
dependency on an appropriate version of Xrandr (that has the required 
support) and let Xrandr/builtin.mk work out whether that means the in-tree 
version can be used or to pull in the package.  I'll have a look at that.

cheers
mark