On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 20:00:17 +0200
Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> wrote:

> i tend to disagree with your argumentation.  the amount of packages in a
> category is irrelevant.  it's more of a "system utility used for task
> scheduling" than time-related application.  i think it makes a bad
> precedent.  for prior art see e.g., wip/vixie-cron.

Yeah, I know it's not a strong argument.  But the thing is that I really
think it is a "time" utility (according to the last part of time's Makefile
comment), but also a system utility...  Looking at sysutils, I saw 'tkcron',
but I thought "I can move it later to time".

I can move the package to sysutils, or add sysutils as a secondary category...

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/