On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:22:59 -0500
Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netbsd.org> wrote:
 
> I'm ambivalent about this.  Renaming packages can be confusing, but if
> openbox (ie 2) is no longer maintained or developed and openbox3 has
> become openbox, then maybe that's the right thing to do.  Other
> thoughts?

Should we remove openbox now then?

-- 
Juan RP <juan AT xtraeme DOT unixbsd DOT org>