-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, James Chacon wrote:

>If you don't want kerberos why would you build this package in the first
>place?

A bulk build on a platform without kerberos (or without pkgsrc support
for kerberos) comes immediately to mind -- and setting PKG_SKIP_REASON
if kerberos is not present deals with that case just fine.

If kerberos is present, I agree that setting KERBEROS= if it is not set
is perfectly reasonable within this package for the reasons you mention
below.


>It's specifically the kerb patches in here folks want so obviously that
>kinda implies the need to define it all correctly.
>
>(and for a bulk build I really shouldn't have to enable the package per se. it
>should just build).
>
>James
>
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, James Chacon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Module Name:	pkgsrc
>>>Committed By:	jmc
>>>Date:		Fri Aug  1 03:21:03 UTC 2003
>>>
>>>Modified Files:
>>>	pkgsrc/security/openssh+gssapi: Makefile
>>>
>>>Log Message:
>>>This needs to define KERBEROS or the section which adds the right libraries
>>>never gets included and nothing links.
>>>
>>
>>That's a good question -- normally, this package should build with
>>krb support if KERBEROS is defined, and without it if it isn't (though I
>>agree that the latter case was broken).
>>
>>OTOH, I agree that it doesn't make any sense to build this package
>>without KERBEROS support.
>>
>>Perhaps a PKG_SKIP_REASON setting if kerberos is not present would make
>>sense?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>- --
>>				Jim Wise
>>				jwise@draga.com
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)
>>
>>iD8DBQE/KtHvlGcH240chEIRAlq1AKCsD1V7HeqIYKeWcLSgSktF5WSMYACfdX2p
>>R+4omJ1v2Y6/cctj3neHKNc=
>>=Lz4f
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>
>

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/KtlrlGcH240chEIRAkYvAJ421l61GYyH5rG1DBnbj1iSNK2lPwCfU2nD
TOeHjBy805AnRA5gArdINkM=
=Z7tZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----