On Sunday 13 July 2003 10:32, wulf@ping.net.au wrote:

> Thanks for info as I wasn't aware about this. Would it be ok to just delete
> the patch file again and use REPLACE_PERL?

Al committed some new stuff that might mean REPLACE_PERL has been replaced 
with a more generic mechanism. I haven't paid close attention.

But, yeah - use the new thing and delete the patch

> I've since done another couple of packages and will need to do it here too.

Indeed

Nickk