Probably something different should be done. I'm open to opinions here
before I go through rototilling the places that refer to Makefile.gcc or
are checking egcs versions.

James

>
>> 2. Makefile.gcc can now be included by anything which depends on gcc versions.
>>    If the version installed isn't 2.95.3 it'll add itself as a BUILD_DEPENDS.
>>    (XXX: any of the makefile's in pkgsrc should be checked and change to use
>>     this)
>
>It would be nice that this file can be referred to as mk/gcc.mk, if
>there's a consensus that kludges to decide the right version of a
>package (or a some subsystem) across base systems and third party
>packages should be assembled under mk/, and the way mk/texinfo.mk is
>to go.
>
>Masao
>
>
>
>