"Dr. Rene Hexel" wrote:
> 
> Nick Hudson wrote:
> 
> > When --enable-syscall-hard is specified actually provide wrappers for all
> > the syscalls that are documented as having wrappers. The ones missing were
> > wait4 and sigprocmask.
> 
>   What about --enable-syscall-soft?  Shouldn't these patches provide
> wrappers here as well?

Actually, yes. The only one that won't de done though is wait4. I'll
take a look.

Nick
-- 
aka skrll@netbsd.org, skrll@excite.co.uk