[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/mk/bulk
Alistair Crooks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:05:00PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
Module Name: pkgsrc
Committed By: agc
Date: Sat Nov 19 19:21:47 UTC 2005
Allow the bulk builds to work by adding security/audit-packages as a
This slows down the pkgsrc build on my machine by approximately 8
seconds per package. Do you really want that?
Bulk builds from scratch run for 5 days on a 3.6 GHz P4, 7 days on a
2.8 GHz P4.
Now *I* am not the one who made the changes which forced
audit-packages to be installed, or SKIP_AUDIT_PACKAGES to be defined
to "yes" before a bulk build run.
I'm sorry of not having noticed that earlier. Of course you were not
involved, it had just looked to me as if. :(
Altogether, there has been far too much upheaval over the last few
days which was ill-considered, not wholly tested, and the drivers
for which are still unclear to me.
If you mean most changes from me I can tell you what the drivers to them
I don't have confidence in shell programs that don't run in "set -e"
mode. Ususally there is no error checking at all, not to mention error
handling. So whenever something unexpected happens, the programs
continue to run, leading to undefined behavior. With the "set -e" mode
they just die. That's why I'm changing the programs into "set -e" mode.
The other thing is that I'm still a beginner regarding bulk builds. I'm
trying to completely understand how they work. But some things make
understanding harder than necessary. For example variable names and file
names. The BROKENFILE variable is used for two completely different
purposes, yet it's only one variable. The top level BROKENFILE is called
".broken.html" by default, yet it does not contain a single HTML tag at
all. Don't you find this confusing, too?
I'm trying to make the bulk build framework so consistent that it would
be a pleasure for me to document it in the pkgsrc guide as a system that
is well thought-out, consistent, robust, reliable, etc. It isn't yet. It
just happens to work. I, however, want it to work because it is designed
to work, not out of coincidence.
Some days ago I had written to Thomas in a private mail that I really
don't like to document things which are awful to describe. At least not
if I can change them. It's fun trying out how the various awk(1)
implementations behave when fed with too much input (in the
regress/tools package), as I know I cannot change them. But the bulk
build framework is something I can change, and that's why I do it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |