Subject: Re: pkg/36437 (planner build fails)
To: None <jmmv@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,>
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Ond=F8ej?= =?ISO-8859-2?Q?T=F9ma?= <ondra.tu@webjet.cz>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 06/04/2007 17:25:05
The following reply was made to PR pkg/36437; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Ond=F8ej?= =?ISO-8859-2?Q?T=F9ma?=" <ondra.tu@webjet.cz>
To: "gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org" <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/36437 (planner build fails)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:22:06 +0000

 Hi,
 
 Here is full log:
 http://linux.blackmouse.biz/pub/blackmouse-current/i686/pkgstat/20070603.2003=
 /time/planner/.broken.html
 
 so if you can disabled python, you must tell it to configure :( In my
 opinion, there could be good idea, to build python support at least via
 PKG_OPTION.
 
 In other thing, there isn't this line in Makefile like in wip/planner
 PKGCONFIG_OVERRIDE+=3D=09libplanner-1.pc.in
 which is good idea,
 
 p5-XML-Parser>=3D2.31nb1 is not need for build now ?
 
 And why isn't this line in new packages in pkgsrc ?:
 USE_LANGUAGES=3D=09=09c c++
 I know, it's only warning, but that's not means it's ok !!
 
 at the end, what i know, wip/planner is tested on a few platforms, so it
 is good idea to get packages from wip if exists and if they are actual.
 
 Dne 4/6/2007, napsal "jmmv@netbsd.org" <jmmv@netbsd.org>:
 
 >Synopsis: planner build fails
 >
 >State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 >State-Changed-By: jmmv@netbsd.org
 >State-Changed-When: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:56:38 +0000
 >State-Changed-Why:
 >Are the Python modules useful?  For what?  If not they could be disabled.
 >
 >
 >