Subject: Re: pkg/36437 (planner build fails)
To: None <jmmv@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,>
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Ond=F8ej?= =?ISO-8859-2?Q?T=F9ma?= <ondra.tu@webjet.cz>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 06/04/2007 17:25:05
The following reply was made to PR pkg/36437; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Ond=F8ej?= =?ISO-8859-2?Q?T=F9ma?=" <ondra.tu@webjet.cz>
To: "gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org" <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/36437 (planner build fails)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:22:06 +0000
Hi,
Here is full log:
http://linux.blackmouse.biz/pub/blackmouse-current/i686/pkgstat/20070603.2003=
/time/planner/.broken.html
so if you can disabled python, you must tell it to configure :( In my
opinion, there could be good idea, to build python support at least via
PKG_OPTION.
In other thing, there isn't this line in Makefile like in wip/planner
PKGCONFIG_OVERRIDE+=3D=09libplanner-1.pc.in
which is good idea,
p5-XML-Parser>=3D2.31nb1 is not need for build now ?
And why isn't this line in new packages in pkgsrc ?:
USE_LANGUAGES=3D=09=09c c++
I know, it's only warning, but that's not means it's ok !!
at the end, what i know, wip/planner is tested on a few platforms, so it
is good idea to get packages from wip if exists and if they are actual.
Dne 4/6/2007, napsal "jmmv@netbsd.org" <jmmv@netbsd.org>:
>Synopsis: planner build fails
>
>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
>State-Changed-By: jmmv@netbsd.org
>State-Changed-When: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:56:38 +0000
>State-Changed-Why:
>Are the Python modules useful? For what? If not they could be disabled.
>
>
>