Subject: Re: 3.1_STABLE issues
To: Louis Guillaume <lguillaume@berklee.edu>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/12/2006 00:16:24
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:56:24AM -0500, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Just a couple things I noticed after doing an upgrade to 3.1_STABLE. 
> Probably just house-cleaning issues...
> 
> 1. /etc/motd reports that it's a development version
>    of the system (even after etcupdate and reboot).
>    But it should probably report that the system is
>    `Stable'.
> 
> 2. /etc/postinstall still wants to fix obsolete by
>    removing these files...
> 
> # postinstall -s / -d / check obsolete
> Source directory: /
>  (extracted from: /)
> Target directory: /
> obsolete check:
>         Remove obsolete file /lib/libcrypto.so.2.1
>         Remove obsolete file /lib/libm.so.0.2
>         Remove obsolete file /lib/libm387.so.0.0
>         Remove obsolete file /lib/libtermcap.so.0.5
>         Remove obsolete link /lib/libtermlib.so.0.5
>         Remove obsolete file /lib/libutil.so.7.6
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libc.so.12.128.2
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2.1
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libm.so.0.2
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libm387.so.0.0
>         Remove obsolete file /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1.4
>         Remove obsolete file /usr/lib/libssh.so.1.0.1
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libtermcap.so.0.5
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libtermlib.so.0.5
>         Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libutil.so.7.6
> postinstall checks passed:
> postinstall checks failed: obsolete
> To fix, run:
>     /usr/sbin/postinstall -s / -d / fix obsolete
> 
> 
> ... which will break the system.

How will it break ? Don't you have other version of these librairies ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--