Subject: Re: recommended 939-board
To: None <netbsd@sopwith.solgatos.com>
From: Petar Bogdanovic <p+netbsd@2005.smokva.net>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 10/10/2005 08:33:10
Dieter wrote:
> What isn't "real deal" about the nForce-chipset? (I must have missed
that thread.)
The following Mails are the most recent ones:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2005/02/19/0002.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2005/05/01/0000.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2005/06/18/0000.html
> The nforce4 boards were the only ones I could find that supported
SATA's NCQ.
Erm.. you just wrote a few days ago, that NCQ seems to be unsupported by
NetBSD:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2005/10/07/0004.html
:)
> The only "not configured" in NetBSD's dmesg are:
>
> Nvidia nForce4 Memory Controller (miscellaneous memory, revision
0xa3) at pci0 dev 0 function 0 not configured
> Nvidia nForce4 SMBus (SMBus serial bus, revision 0xa2) at pci0 dev 1
function 1 not configured
> Nvidia product 0x0057 (miscellaneous bridge, revision 0xa3) at pci0
dev 10 function 0 not configured
What is this anyway? I suppose, the last one has something to do with
nVidias 'ActiveArmour'-Firewall..
> I haven't tried the onboard Ethernet or audio yet.
Could you do that for me? ;)
With kind regards,
Petar