Subject: Re: color in console
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@student.kun.nl>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 10/08/2004 12:15:38
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:53:43AM +0100, Julian Coleman wrote:
> The termcap definition for the vt220 (*) does not contain colour.  I'm fa=
irly
> sure that real DEC VT220's didn't support it, so it shouldn't be in the e=
ntry.
> The WSCONS console is a superset of vt220 and supports colour (unless you=
 have
> selected Sun emulation).  So, you can use wsvt25 or wsvt25m as your termi=
nal
> type in order to get colour support on the console.

Ah, so that is the recommended setting...  Then, why isn't this the default
on freshly installed systems?

If there are good reasons to set it to vt220 by default, isn't it an option
to have sysinst at least ask if you would like to change to wsvt25?

IMHO a system should have settings that are optimal, if reasonably possible
unless breaking on other systems or leading to security hazards.  If the
terminal supports color, a color-enabled term setting is the optimal so
should be the default.

Regards,
Peter
--=20
http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
							-- Donald Knuth

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBZmjKLg33BXzVMqsRAv1rAKCOtydpZs3+e3Jy+BRYavaAWuapzwCgoXz/
84RVnwarXe+c0U40wOBZA3Y=
=YNG1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--