Subject: Re: Flash for *BSD Petition
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+nbsd@2004.snew.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 08/18/2004 18:30:39
Quoting Konrad Neuwirth (konrad@mailathome.or.at):
> Ben Collver <collver@peak.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:42:28AM -0700, Andy Ruhl wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:32:39 -0700, Ben Collver <collver@peak.org> wrote:
> > > > Okay, but I'd like people to develop for open standards such as SVG.
> > > 
> > I wouldn't suggest that it would hurt to port it to BSD.  However, I
> > was being asked to advocate a proprietary standard, and happened to
> > mention a similar standard that is both open and portable.
> 
> It's open and portable, but not similar.  SVG is a vector graphics
> format, Flash is an application environment that just happens to be
> largely used for animations, but that can also natively interface with
> SQL databases. 

I have to say that I've delighted in the plug in for a mac laptop
that lets me KILL FLASH.  Only RARELY is it not for an ad. An
annoying ad like a 4 year old saying "dad, dad, dad, dad, dad, dad,
hey dad, dad" while you wish you could drink yourself into oblivion.

I used to intercept it at the home gateway, but have been using the
laptop at work and don't really want to ensquid the laptop and
selfproxy.

Flash Bad.  Flash Annoying.

You're signing a petition to get <BLINK> tags.


Thanks, I'll stick with open standards.  If I wanted proprietary,
I'd have kept a compuserve account and ignored the Internet (ok, I
used Internet/Bitnet long before CompuServe, but when there were no
ISPs in NY - before Panix was a MacII with a bunch of serial cards,
it's what we had.  And it didn't have Flash and we rejoiced.).