Subject: Re: wu-ftpd has a security hole
To: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/30/2001 01:06:43
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 02:28:27PM -0500, Steve Bellovin wrote:
> There's been a fair amount of discussion on bugtraq about a security=20
> hole in wu-ftpd. It's not part of NetBSD, but it is in the package=20
> collection and it's pretty popular...
the interesting point is that this bug is quite old.. see:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/82/180823
To: Vuln-Dev
Subject: some ftpd implementations mishandle CWD ~{
Date: Apr 30 2001 9:00PM
Author: Matt Power <mhpower@bos.bindview.com>
anyway, i wonder who can still use wu-ftpd after all those remote exploitab=
le
root bugs they had introduced.
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\=
--
-- <salo@silcnet.org> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ /=
--
-- Microsoft proprietary formats X =
--
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \=
--
-- Key Fingerprint: DBEC 8BEC 9A90 ECEC 0FEF 716E 59CE B70B 7E3B 70E2 =
--
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8Bs2TWc63C347cOIRAgrfAJ9QQ/lC7Til/LAHsgRjSadelXfnaACffE9J
575iWV6ImeT40bhJI4JtLqE=
=gpuL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--