Subject: Re: Port benchmarks
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Douglas Wade Needham <cinnion@infinet.com>
List: netbsd-ports
Date: 03/26/2000 16:59:26
Sender: netbsd-ports-owner@netbsd.org
Quoting Manuel Bouyer (bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr):
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:57:15AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
> > UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
> > --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
> > i386-netb NetBSD 1.4.1 39 39 36 29 201 92 68 201 92
> > alpha-net NetBSD 1.4J 93 103 92 148 79 77 149 129
> > alpha-dec OSF1 T5.0 411 366 438 1158 527 293 1153 486
> >
> > The first is my _old_ DEC Prioris PPro 166 (to show that DEC sometimes
> > got memory bandwidth right in the past), the middle is a PC164 (whose
> > number match up with hbench) and the last is a DS20 (to show that they
> > still can sometimes get memory bandwidth right ;).
>
> I have a DS 20 running NetBSD 1.4U.
> Could you send me the parameters you gave to lmbench, so that we can compare ?
Please post them here! I was getting ready to do some baseline
benchmarks on a couple of my machines including a HP9000/F10 running HP/UX
10.20 and a P100 running either BSD/OS 3.0 or 1.4.1. Using a
common set of parameters could help in doing some apples-to-oranges
comparisons immediately, as well as some apples-to-apples comparisons
later.
--
Douglas Wade Needham UN*X Consultant & BSD kernel programmer
Email: cinnion @ infinet . com http://www.infinet.com/~cinnion