Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:23:22PM +0200, rudolf wrote:
>   | Luke Mewburn wrote:
>   | >On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:35:47PM +0200, rudolf wrote:
>   | []
>   | >The obsolete directory is a weird one; all of the obsolete files in that
>   | >directory that were part of the 2.0 release should have been listed as
>   | >obsolete in the set lists.  Do you have some extra files in that
>   | >directory, or is there a mistake in the set lists?
>   | 
>   | Just now I have updated a virgin NetBSD-2.0.2 to today's 3_BETA and the 
>   | postinstall output was the same.
> 
> Please send-pr this problem & the details below so that we don't
> forget about this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Luke.

install/31099

r.