Subject: RAID0 (I know, I know) reconstruction on another drive pair.
To: None <netbsd-help@netbsd.org>
From: Marc Tooley <netbsdMLpostNO@spam.quake.ca>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 08/25/2005 12:35:32
I have a RAID0 partition that has had one of the drives just go partly
belly-up in it, and am trying to salvage what I can from the setup.
Basically, drive #1 has:
a: 4195233 63 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 0
b: 1023120 4195296 swap # (Cyl. 4162
c: 60030369 63 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0
d: 60030432 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0
e: 10486224 5218416 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 5177
f: 44325792 15704640 RAID # (Cyl. 15580
Drive #2 has:
c: 60030369 63 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0*-
d: 60030432 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 -
e: 15704577 63 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 0*-
f: 44325792 15704640 RAID # (Cyl. 15580 -
I have two other drives that aren't identical, but close (2 x 40GB
instead of 2 x 30GB) and I did the following to copy over the bad
volumes to the good:
dd conv=noerror if=/dev/rwd0d ibs=64k | progress -l 30g dd of=/dev/rwd2d
obs=64k
dd conv=noerror if=/dev/rwd1d ibs=64k | progress -l 30g dd of=/dev/rwd3d
obs=64k
... and this seemed to work. Basically, I was able to run:
disklabel wd2
disklabel wd3
... and both commands returned useful information after a reboot. I was
also able to duplicate the raid.conf file for the first set, for the
new set, and run:
raidctl -c raid1.conf raid1
... and then I got an identical disklabel to the original raid0 set
from:
disklabel raid1
... my excitement and relief was premature, unfortunately.
I have two problems now:
. Mounting the new RAID0 set gives me *all kinds* of problems. Almost
every file has a bad type on it: files are special device files,
directories are files, strange modes are all over the place.. etc etc.
. The second volume set isn't bootable, while the first one is.
. Doing anything useful is difficult because my kernel:
NetBSD warp 3.99.3 NetBSD 3.99.3
... panics at the first sign of corruption. It's been slow going. :(
My questions:
1. Do you have any suggestions for me to rebuild the RAID set on the new
volume with the greatest chance of success? Hopefully Mr. Oster might
be kind enough to reply to the list. :-)
2. Why didn't dd copy over the bootblocks and make the "clean" set
bootable? When I pull the bad drives, the machine insists there's "No
operating system." wd0d and wd2d/wd3d all have d partitions that
encompass the whole 30GB portion from 0 onwards.
Thanks in advance for your comments.
-Marc