On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:39:59AM -0500, Webmaster Jim wrote:
> What would be a nice way to respond to Tom's claim that NetBSD ships a
> "broken make" program? I have not tried to build lynx on 2.0 yet, but

Is there no truth to Stef Caunter's claim that NetBSD has "broken
headers"?  I have my own suspicions that there may be something fishy
(at least 1.6) from experiences building "off beat" programs, but only
suspicions since I have no where near the knowledge to back up such a
claim.

-- 
henry nelson
 | day job: | http://yuba.kcn.ne.jp/biorec/nehan/henken.html