Manuel Bouyer wrote:

>On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 06:52:20PM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>  
>
>>Be aware, however, that the commandline you pasted above might actually 
>>get you -current instead of 2.0;  the "-A" flag has the effect of 
>>getting rid of any sticky tags (like netbsd-2-0), so I'm not sure what 
>>its behaviour in conjunction with -r is.  You might want to do a 'cvs 
>>status' on one of the files in the tree to make sure you've really got 
>>the 2.0 branch.
>>    
>>
>
>It should work. I always use 'cvs update -dPA -r netbsd-2-0'.
>
>  
>

My only concern was the order of the options, but I have since confirmed 
that it does work OK in the order presented.  (Sorry for the confusion)
+j

-- 
Jeff Rizzo                                         riz@redcrowgroup.com
Red Crow Group LLC                                 http://www.redcrowgroup.com/
+1 415 550 0310