Subject: Re: kernel config w/ adjustkernel
To: Malcolm Herbert <mjch@mjch.net>
From: Ja'far Railton <zen25058@zen.co.uk>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 08/11/2004 16:16:40
Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:21:30AM +0100, Ja'far Railton wrote:
> |This has been solved thanks to Simas who tweaked the kernel config
> |produced by adjustkernel a little bit extra. Still wish I knew why the
> |adjustkernel config doesn't work "out of the box" but nevermind...
> 
> ... which is a pity, since I hadn't heard of adjustkernel before and
> would like to use it but am not sure whether to trust it. What was the
> root cause of the problem? Was adjustkernel fixed?
> 
Hi

Here's what Simas told me about it:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: kernel config w/adjustkernel
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:32:31 +0300
From: Simas Mockevicius <symka@NetBSD.org>
To: Ja'far Railton <zen25058@zen.co.uk>


Hi Ja'far

well, i have commented those options because I have examined source code
of the file, which contains error message you got.
adjustkernel is not broken, but it is outdated. it was initialy writen
for netbsd 1.5x, and in those days NetBSD version is 1.6.x and 2_BETA.
so it need to be updated. maybe author will do this,
maybe one day I will. ;)

Sincerely,
Simas Mockevicius.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:21:27AM +0100, Ja'far Railton wrote:
 > Hi Simas
 >
 > I am writing again because another person on the list is also interested
 > to know about this... How did you know to alter some of the other 
config settings?
 > Obviously, I tried to comment out the pseudo-devices that 'make 
depend' was
 > complaining about, but still the 'make depend' wouldn't work. But 
when you commented
 > out some others - it worked. Is there some principle behind your 
modifications
 > or are you "just a guru"? Also, would you say adjustkernel is 
"broken" somehow?
 >
 > --
 > Ja'far