On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:59:39PM -0400, Gan Uesli Starling wrote:
> I am leaning toward the purchase of an Intel D865GBF motherboard
> with built-in graphics.
> 
> Does anybody know for CERTAIN wheter the built-in graphics
> on this motherboard are supported under XFree86 as packaged
> with NetBSD 1.6.2? It seems to be okay for Linux, but there
> are no info

I don't know for certain, but I have an i865 motherboard (model number
unknown) inside a small PC housing, and it shows me:

NetBSD 2.0E (SYS) #1: Sat Apr 24 22:08:14 BST 2004
        agc@somewhere:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/SYS
total memory = 1015 MB
avail memory = 986 MB
BIOS32 rev. 0 found at 0xfb150
mainbus0 (root)
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: Intel Pentium 4 (686-class), 3192.16 MHz, id 0xf29
cpu0: features bfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR>
cpu0: features bfebfbff<PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX>
cpu0: features bfebfbff<FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF>
cpu0: I-cache 12K uOp cache 8-way, D-cache 8 KB 64b/line 4-way
cpu0: L2 cache 512 KB 64b/line 8-way
cpu0: ITLB 4K/4M: 128 entries
cpu0: DTLB 4K/4M: 64 entries
cpu0: 16 page colors
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
pci0: i/o space, memory space enabled, rd/line, rd/mult, wr/inv ok
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0
pchb0: Intel 82865 Host (rev. 0x02)
agp0 at pchb0: detected 8060k stolen memory
agp0: aperture at 0xf0000000, size 0x8000000
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Intel 82865G Integrated Graphics Device (rev. 0x02)
wsdisplay0 at vga1 kbdmux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsmux1: connecting to wsdisplay0

and I use the standard i810 XF86 driver. I've not tried NetBSD 1.6.2,
I'm running -current on this box.

XF86 is standard xsrc, i.e. XF86 4.4.0:

(II) I810: Driver for Intel Integrated Graphics Chipsets: i810, i810-dc100,
        i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 852GM/855GM, 865G
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:02:0
(--) Chipset 865G found

IIRC, the only funny was the 10/100 fxp on this board, and Matthias
Drochner added the necessary glue in March for this to get recognised
automatically (it wasn't in GENERIC, IIRC).

Regards,
Alistair