Hi, Richard.

Richard Rauch wrote:
> Is this considered a known bug?  I thought that *static* member functions
> could have their addresses taken just like "real" functions.

I thought so, too. See
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=3A9BE21D.F3826AA7%40jena-optronik.de

However, I was corrected by Dima Volodin (see the complete
thread). So, I think, the behaviour which you see can be
justified because the program is not standard compliant.

I did not investigate your problem further. There might be
another bug which is the real reason for the crashes.

Kind regards
    Ingolf
-- 

Ingolf Steinbach                       Jena-Optronik GmbH
ingolf.steinbach@jena-optronik.de       ++49 3641 200-147
PGP: 0x7B3B5661  213C 828E 0C92 16B5  05D0 4D5B A324 EC04