On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Jeff Flowers wrote:

> >I don't know of a list like you mention, but it
> >would indeed be pretty handy. But it would
> >be one more thing to maintain...
>
> True but something like this should be able to be automated.

A lot of the base software doesn't have version numbers in the first place
-- other than the revision numbers for individual source files.

I haven't looked at the new syspkging tools very close, but I guess that
they do keep track of version numbers.

(Someone already mentioned the list of outside software which does have
version numbers.)

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/