Robert Elz wrote:
 >
> The NetBSD "vi" is "nvi", which is pretty close to the original.   Forget
> "vim", that's rubbish ("improved" indeed!)
> 

I'm not disputing that vim may be rubbish - I've never looked at the
source code - but could you qualify in what way it's rubbish? I use
vim every working day on my Linux machine at work, and haven't
ever experienced a single crash. The default RedHat version's a
little bloated on the feature front, but that's the only place I can
fault it.

Chris

-- 
chris.wareham@iosystems.co.uk (work)
cwareham@btinternet.com (home)