In message <20011209135117.A20901@roystonvasey.local>, Chris Pinnock writes:
>On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 05:01:45PM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote:
>> Is 5.2 much better than 5.1?  If so, it will probably be worth it for
>> me to grab those.  Otherwise, I'll stick with the 5.1a I have working now.

>I have found 5.2 to be much more stable than 5.1

Well, I'll have to see if I can get it running.  Can anyone confirm that it
works on NetBSD these days?

-s