On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 07:53:38PM -0400, cpctc wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Manuel Bouyer" <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
> | > Jul 24 21:45:29 horbot bootpd[2229]: sending reply (with RFC1048 options)
> | > Jul 24 21:45:29 horbot bootpd[2229]: setarp 10.10.10.10 - 00:00:C0:95:D0:1C
> | > Jul 24 21:45:29 horbot bootpd[2229]: arp -d 10.10.10.10; arp -s 10.10.10.10
> | > 00:00:C0:95:D0:1C temp
> |
> | Please run 'arp' at this point to check that the address is properly
> | set in the arp table.
> 
> arp looks happy to me, a non-expert:
> arp -a yields:
> 
> bagel.compound.local (10.10.10.10) at 00:00:c0:95:d0:1c
> horbot.compound.local (10.10.10.2) at (incomplete)
> ? (10.10.10.255) at (incomplete)

Yes, looks good. I don't have more idea, sorry 

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--