Subject: Re: disklabel & odd partition boundaries.
To: Dave Huang <khym@realtime.net>
From: Richard Rauch <rauch@eecs.ukans.edu>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 01/04/2001 16:43:54
> > I'm also still not sure how many ``some'' amounts to. Is it commonplace,
> > or rare? Something that only expensive drives do? (Most drives still
> > have RPM numbers associated with them; if they achieve the differing
> > densities by rotating at different speeds, then a single RPM is at best
[...]
> I'd say all modern drives have varying numbers of sectors per track... and
So if a modern drive lists a single RPM rating, what (if anything) is one
to make of that? Average-per-cylinder? Average-per-sector? Minimum?
Maximum? Or is it some kind of effective RPM (based on some nominal
geometry and the speed at which a single block passes under the drive
head)?
> it's not that the data density really varies; the outside tracks have more
> area, and hence can fit more sectors.
Erm, yeah. I was thinking roughly backwards. (^& (It's easier than
thinking forwards, since you just have to follow the tracks...)
"I probably don't know what I'm talking about." --rauch@eecs.ukans.edu