In message <Pine.WNT.4.30.0012162308470.-823545@todd>, Todd Vierling writes:
>But I have a feeling this isn't really what you wanted to know... if you
>could explain the context of your question, it might help to produce a more
>relevant answer.  8-)

Presumably he's referring to the "16 bit versus 32 bit" description of the
difference between Windows 3.1 and, say, OS/2.  (I'm going to leave the
debate about the bittiness of Win9x out of this.)

-s