I have been having some troubles with this as well. I finally resolved
to wait until swap was capable of being run on a raidframe disk. There
was nothing I could do to get the raid coming back up w/ clean parity
so I just split the disks into separate swap and now I'm waiting for
the kernel fix. Other than that and some speed issues, RAIDFrame works
excellently.

ttyl,

marc

On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Ben Collver wrote:

> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:29:34 -0800
> From: Ben Collver <collver@softhome.net>
> To: Greg Oster <oster@cs.usask.ca>
> Cc: netbsd-help@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: raidframe
> 
> > After the 'swapctl -d /dev/raid0b', does a 'swapctl -a /dev/raid0b' succeed?
> 
> Yes.  And I went through the whole sequence several times, and the parity
> stayed clean.
> 
> > Let's also backup a step...  If you disable swap completely, does the parity 
> > remain clean after a reboot?
> 
> If I disable swap completely the parity remains clean after a reboot.
> 
> Ben
> --
> "Do you suppose robots would enjoy listening to music?
>  Would you be willing to work on it?"
>